📊 Статистика дайджестов

Всего дайджестов: 34022 Добавлено сегодня: 82

Последнее обновление: сегодня
Авторы:

Xiangen Hu, Jiarui Tong, Sheng Xu

Саммари на русском не найдено
Доступные поля: ['id', 'arxiv_id', 'title', 'authors', 'abstract', 'summary_ru', 'categories', 'published_date', 'created_at']
Annotation:
Training and education in human-centered fields require authentic practice, yet realistic simulations of human behavior have remained limited. We present a multi-agent psychological simulation system that models internal cognitive-affective processes to generate believable human behaviors. In contrast to black-box neural models, this system is grounded in established psychological theories (e.g., self-efficacy, mindset, social constructivism) and explicitly simulates an ``inner parliament'' of a...
ID: 2511.02606v1 cs.AI, cs.HC
Авторы:

Jieshan Chen, Suyu Ma, Qinghua Lu, Sung Une Lee, Liming Zhu

Саммари на русском не найдено
Доступные поля: ['id', 'arxiv_id', 'title', 'authors', 'abstract', 'summary_ru', 'categories', 'published_date', 'created_at']
Annotation:
Before deploying an AI system to replace an existing process, it must be compared with the incumbent to ensure improvement without added risk. Traditional evaluation relies on ground truth for both systems, but this is often unavailable due to delayed or unknowable outcomes, high costs, or incomplete data, especially for long-standing systems deemed safe by convention. The more practical solution is not to compute absolute risk but the difference between systems. We therefore propose a marginal ...
ID: 2510.27163v1 cs.SE, cs.AI, cs.HC, D.2.8; D.2.9.m; I.2
Авторы:

Forough Mehralian, Ryan Shar, James R. Rae, Alireza Hashemi

Саммари на русском не найдено
Доступные поля: ['id', 'arxiv_id', 'title', 'authors', 'abstract', 'summary_ru', 'categories', 'published_date', 'created_at']
Annotation:
As large language models become increasingly capable of generating code, evaluating their performance remains a complex and evolving challenge. Existing benchmarks primarily focus on functional correctness, overlooking the diversity of real-world coding tasks and developer expectations. To this end, we introduce a multi-language benchmark that evaluates LLM instruction-following capabilities and is extensible to operate on any set of standalone coding problems. Our benchmark evaluates instructio...
ID: 2510.27565v1 cs.SE, cs.AI, cs.HC
Авторы:

Vanessa Figueiredo, David Elumeze

Саммари на русском не найдено
Доступные поля: ['id', 'arxiv_id', 'title', 'authors', 'abstract', 'summary_ru', 'categories', 'published_date', 'created_at']
Annotation:
Large Language Models (LLMs) promise to transform interactive games by enabling non-player characters (NPCs) to sustain unscripted dialogue. Yet it remains unclear whether constrained prompts actually improve player experience. We investigate this question through The Interview, a voice-based detective game powered by GPT-4o. A within-subjects usability study ($N=10$) compared high-constraint (HCP) and low-constraint (LCP) prompts, revealing no reliable experiential differences beyond sensitivit...
ID: 2510.25820v1 cs.AI, cs.HC, I.2.7; H.5.2
Авторы:

Nissan Yaron, Dan Bystritsky, Ben-Etzion Yaron

Саммари на русском не найдено
Доступные поля: ['id', 'arxiv_id', 'title', 'authors', 'abstract', 'summary_ru', 'categories', 'published_date', 'created_at']
Annotation:
We introduce Humans-Junior, a 3.8B model that matches GPT-4o on the FACTS Grounding public subset within a $\pm 5$ pp equivalence margin. Results. On Q1--Q500 under identical judges, GPT-4o scores 73.5% (95% CI 69.5--77.2) and Humans-Junior 72.7% (95% CI 68.7--76.5); the paired difference is 0.8 pp (bootstrap 95% CI $-3.1$ to $+4.7$; permutation $p = 0.72$; Cohen's $d = 0.023$). TOST establishes equivalence at $\pm 5$ pp (not at $\pm 3$ pp). When purchased as managed APIs, Humans-Junior's base...
ID: 2510.25933v1 cs.AI, cs.HC, cs.LG, cs.NE
Авторы:

Andrew L. Kun

Саммари на русском не найдено
Доступные поля: ['id', 'arxiv_id', 'title', 'authors', 'abstract', 'summary_ru', 'categories', 'published_date', 'created_at']
Annotation:
The AI we use is powerful, and its power is increasing rapidly. If this powerful AI is to serve the needs of consumers, voters, and decision makers, then it is imperative that the AI is accountable. In general, an agent is accountable to a forum if the forum can request information from the agent about its actions, if the forum and the agent can discuss this information, and if the forum can sanction the agent. Unfortunately, in too many cases today's AI is not accountable -- we cannot question ...
ID: 2510.26057v1 cs.AI, cs.HC
Авторы:

Rishub Jain, Sophie Bridgers, Lili Janzer, Rory Greig, Tian Huey Teh, Vladimir Mikulik

Саммари на русском не найдено
Доступные поля: ['id', 'arxiv_id', 'title', 'authors', 'abstract', 'summary_ru', 'categories', 'published_date', 'created_at']
Annotation:
Human feedback is critical for aligning AI systems to human values. As AI capabilities improve and AI is used to tackle more challenging tasks, verifying quality and safety becomes increasingly challenging. This paper explores how we can leverage AI to improve the quality of human oversight. We focus on an important safety problem that is already challenging for humans: fact-verification of AI outputs. We find that combining AI ratings and human ratings based on AI rater confidence is better tha...
ID: 2510.26518v1 cs.AI, cs.HC
Авторы:

Stefano Natangelo

Саммари на русском не найдено
Доступные поля: ['id', 'arxiv_id', 'title', 'authors', 'abstract', 'summary_ru', 'categories', 'published_date', 'created_at']
Annotation:
Artificial intelligence systems based on large language models (LLMs) can now generate coherent text, music, and images, yet they operate without a persistent state: each inference reconstructs context from scratch. This paper introduces the Narrative Continuity Test (NCT) -- a conceptual framework for evaluating identity persistence and diachronic coherence in AI systems. Unlike capability benchmarks that assess task performance, the NCT examines whether an LLM remains the same interlocutor acr...
ID: 2510.24831v1 cs.CY, cs.AI, cs.HC
Авторы:

Mateen Ahmed Abbasi, Petri Ihantola, Tommi Mikkonen, Niko Mäkitalo

Саммари на русском не найдено
Доступные поля: ['id', 'arxiv_id', 'title', 'authors', 'abstract', 'summary_ru', 'categories', 'published_date', 'created_at']
Annotation:
The future of Requirements Engineering (RE) is increasingly driven by artificial intelligence (AI), reshaping how we elicit, analyze, and validate requirements. Traditional RE is based on labor-intensive manual processes prone to errors and complexity. AI-powered approaches, specifically large language models (LLMs), natural language processing (NLP), and generative AI, offer transformative solutions and reduce inefficiencies. However, the use of AI in RE also brings challenges like algorithmic ...
ID: 2510.25016v1 cs.SE, cs.AI, cs.HC, cs.LG, 68T07, 68N30, D.2.1; I.2.6; I.2.7
Авторы:

Shuqing Li, Jiayi Yan, Chenyu Niu, Jen-tse Huang, Yun Peng, Wenxuan Wang, Yepang Liu, Michael R. Lyu

Саммари на русском не найдено
Доступные поля: ['id', 'arxiv_id', 'title', 'authors', 'abstract', 'summary_ru', 'categories', 'published_date', 'created_at']
Annotation:
Virtual Reality (VR) games require players to translate high-level semantic actions into precise device manipulations using controllers and head-mounted displays (HMDs). While humans intuitively perform this translation based on common sense and embodied understanding, whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can effectively replicate this ability remains underexplored. This paper introduces a benchmark, ComboBench, evaluating LLMs' capability to translate semantic actions into VR device manipulatio...
ID: 2510.24706v1 cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.HC, cs.SE
Показано 71 - 80 из 238 записей