Rational Adversaries and the Maintenance of Fragility: A Game-Theoretic Theory of Rational Stagnation
2510.22232v1
cs.GT, cs.AI, econ.TH
2025-10-29
Авторы:
Daisuke Hirota
Abstract
Cooperative systems often remain in persistently suboptimal yet stable
states. This paper explains such "rational stagnation" as an equilibrium
sustained by a rational adversary whose utility follows the principle of
potential loss, $u_{D} = U_{ideal} - U_{actual}$. Starting from the Prisoner's
Dilemma, we show that the transformation $u_{i}' = a\,u_{i} + b\,u_{j}$ and the
ratio of mutual recognition $w = b/a$ generate a fragile cooperation band
$[w_{\min},\,w_{\max}]$ where both (C,C) and (D,D) are equilibria. Extending to
a dynamic model with stochastic cooperative payoffs $R_{t}$ and intervention
costs $(C_{c},\,C_{m})$, a Bellman-style analysis yields three strategic
regimes: immediate destruction, rational stagnation, and intervention
abandonment. The appendix further generalizes the utility to a
reference-dependent nonlinear form and proves its stability under reference
shifts, ensuring robustness of the framework. Applications to social-media
algorithms and political trust illustrate how adversarial rationality can
deliberately preserve fragility.
Ссылки и действия
Дополнительные ресурсы: