Estimation of aboveground biomass in a tropical dry forest: An intercomparison of airborne, unmanned, and space laser scanning
2510.27408v2
eess.SP, cs.LG
2025-11-05
Авторы:
Nelson Mattié, Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa, Pablo Crespo-Peremarch, Juan-Ygnacio López-Hernández
Abstract
According to the Paris Climate Change Agreement, all nations are required to
submit reports on their greenhouse gas emissions and absorption every two years
by 2024. Consequently, forests play a crucial role in reducing carbon
emissions, which is essential for meeting these obligations. Recognizing the
significance of forest conservation in the global battle against climate
change, Article 5 of the Paris Agreement emphasizes the need for high-quality
forest data. This study focuses on enhancing methods for mapping aboveground
biomass in tropical dry forests. Tropical dry forests are considered one of the
least understood tropical forest environments; therefore, there is a need for
accurate approaches to estimate carbon pools. We employ a comparative analysis
of AGB estimates, utilizing different discrete and full-waveform laser scanning
datasets in conjunction with Ordinary Least Squares and Bayesian approaches
SVM. Airborne Laser Scanning, Unmanned Laser Scanning, and Space Laser Scanning
were used as independent variables for extracting forest metrics. Variable
selection, SVM regression tuning, and cross-validation via a machine-learning
approach were applied to account for overfitting and underfitting. The results
indicate that six key variables primarily related to tree height:
Elev\.minimum, Elev\.L3, lev\.MAD.mode, Elev\.mode, Elev\.MAD\.median, and
Elev\.skewness, are important for AGB estimation using ALSD and ULSD, while
Leaf Area Index, canopy coverage and height, terrain elevation, and
full-waveform signal energy emerged as the most vital variables. AGB values
estimated from ten permanent tropical dry forest plots in Costa Rica Guanacaste
province ranged from 26.02 Mg/ha to 175.43 Mg/ha. The SVM regressions
demonstrated a 17.89 error across all laser scanning systems, with SLSF W
exhibiting the lowest error 17.07 in estimating total biomass per plot.
Ссылки и действия
Дополнительные ресурсы: